A Commonplace Book

Home | Authors | Titles | Words | Subjects | Random Quote | Advanced Search | About...


Search Help   |   Advanced Search

New Statesman (Davis)

 

There is a celebrated definition of "bullshit" by the philosopher Harry Frankfurt, which is basically a disregard for whether what one is saying is true or not, as opposed to lying, when one knows it isn't true and is deliberately recounting a falsehood.

...Davis [Evan Davis, author of Post-Truth: Why We Have Reached Peak Bullshit and What We Can Do About It] wants to define bullshit much more broadly, as "any form of communication -- verbal or non-verbal -- that is not the clearest or most succinct statement of the sincere and reasonably held beliefs of the communicator". In that case, we all traffic in bullshit most of the time, and for very good reasons.

"Genuine frankness is not the norm but the exception," Davis points out, defending the circumlocutory speech of diplomats or doctors, of people offering sympathy or encouragement, and even of politicians in some circumstances. At one point, amusingly, he even defends a piece of flowery wine writing. "This is good gibberish," he judges, "because I think for the intended readers the material is well devised."
-- Steven Poole. What's the opposite of post-truth? It's not as simple as "the facts", New Statesman (18 May 2017).
permalink